1. Statement based on: 5 million implantations1h 300+ Publications1g 100% Survivorship at 17 Years1a Lowest revision rate1b-e Benchmark for PROMs1f 10A* ODEP rating for CR and PS knees both with and without patella1g Every 90 seconds a patient receives a NexGen knee1h 1 in 5 knees implanted globally is a NexGen Knee1i
1a. Kim, Y.H., et al. Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better? International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2014) 38:297–303.
1b. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide.AOA 2016: Table KT9 Cumulative Percent Revision of Primary Total Knee Replacement with Cement Fixation.
1c. Australian Orthopaedic Association
National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide. AOA
2016: Table KT10 Cumulative Percent Revision of Primary Total Knee
Replacement with Cementless Fixation.
1d. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide. AOA 2016: Table KT11 Cumulative Percent Revision of Primary Total Knee Replacement with Hybrid Fixation.
1e. Select variants from the 2016 Swedish National Registry available at http://myknee.se/en/ (pgs 42-43).
1f. Baker, P.N., et al., The effect of
surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br.
2012;94:1058.
1g. Latest ODEP ratings can be found at http://www.odep. org. uk.
1h. 2016 Sales data available at Zimmer Biomet.
1i. EMBASE search: «NexGen» AND «Knee».
2. Zimmer ZRR _WA_2409_11.
3. Zimmer ZRR_WA_2580_12.
4. Zimmer ZRR_WA_2537_12.
5. Zimmer TM1140.98.
6. Zimmer ZRR_WA_2403_11.
7. Zimmer ZRR_WA_2551_12.
8. Zimmer ZRR_WA_2401_11.