Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Oxford^® Partial Knee Replacement

Overview Key Data Points Features Related Items Resources Videos Contact Us Additional Information

The most widely used¹ and clinically proven^2,3 partial knee in the world

With 45 years of clinical heritage, the Oxford Partial Knee is the most widely used¹ and clinically proven^2,3 partial knee system in the world.

The Oxford® Partial Knee Replacement is available in cementless and cemented fixation. The Oxford PKR has more than 300 publications and the Oxford Cementless Partial Knee has demonstrated 10-year survivorship of 94.15%* in the national registry of the UK. Also available as Oxford Titanium Niobium (TiNbN) and for patients suffering from lateral osteoarthritis the Oxford® Fixed Lateral can be used.

*Ref: UKNJR 2021.

Procedures

Knee Reconstruction
Partial Knee Replacement

Philosophies

Mobile Bearing

Patient Satisfaction

After one year, a randomized, controlled study showed that significantly more partial knee patients would have the operation again compared to total knee patients.¹³

Less Complications

A multi-center study demonstrated decreased morbidity and complications of PKA compared to TKA¹⁴

Proven² and reproducible technique

With Microplasty^® Instrumentation⁸

Best-in-class continuous education program

Providing in-person and virtual training opportunities

Patient Preference

46% of patients would choose a PKR over a TKR when presented with the various risks and benefits of both options.¹⁵This is significantly higher than the 10% of knee replacement patients who receive a PKR today.¹⁶

Less Opioid Usage

A study showed that PKR patients require fewer narcotics following surgery, for a shorter duration of use, less refills, and have a lower likelihood of narcotic requirement at 4 weeks.¹⁷

Clinically Proven

Survivorship at 15 years

94.0%

At Minimum 15 Year Postoperative (432 knees)⁶

Survivorship at 20 years

91.0%

91.0% Kaplan Meier Survivorship at min 20 years (14 knees)²

Features

The Oxford Partial Knee offers surgeons a partial knee replacement that is less invasive and has demonstrated lower morbidity and pain scores when compared to total knee replacement.⁶

Reproducible Microplasty Instrumentation

Microplasty Instrumentation simplifies the surgical technique, providing for accurate and reproducible implant positioning.⁸ Microplasty instrumentation also shows a reduction in OR time of almost 9 minutes,⁹ reduced risk of dislocation¹⁰ and improved alignment¹¹ compared to Phase 3 Instrumentation.

Biomet Bone Cement R

High viscosity, non-antibiotic, radiopaque and easy handling.

X Series^™ Power System

Developed through the shared experience of an international team ofsurgeons and engineers, X Series™ Power System provides a system thatputs you in control.

Modern Cementing Technique

Zimmer Biomet’s comprehensive assortment of bone cement and products for mixing and delivery, pressurization and bone bed preparation makes for one of the most complete portfolios for Modern Cementing Technique in the market today.

Resources

Education

Oxford Partial Knee Surgical Technique

Surgical steps for performing Oxford Partial Knee replacement.

Oxford® Titanium Microplasty® Instrumentation Surgical Technique

Collateral

Health Economics

Learn more about the health economic benefits of PKA.

Videos

Click to play video

Oxford Partial Knee with Microplasty Instrumentation Animation

Click to play video

Oxford Partial Knee Course Overview

Contact us for more information

Additional Information

Data on file at Zimmer Biomet. Based on Market Analysis and Registry Data, gathered September 2017.
Price, A. and Svard, U. A Second Decade Lifetable Survival Analysis of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1): 174-9.
Pandit et al. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1493–1500.
Svard, U. and Price, A. Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. A Survival Analysis of an Independent Series. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 83:191–194. 2001.
Price, A. et al. Long-term Clinical Results of the Medial Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research. 435:171–180. 2005
Kim, K.T. et al. A Prospective Analysis of Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 30(5 Suppl): 15-18, 2007.
Goodfellow, J. and O’Connor, J. The Mechanics of the Knee and Prosthesis Design. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br). 60(3):358–69, 1978.
Hurst JM et al. Radiographic Comparison of Mobile- Bearing Partial Knee Single-Peg versus Twin-Peg Design. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 30(3): 475-478. 2015.
Berend, K, et al. New Instrumentation Reduces Operative Time in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using the Oxford Mobile Bearing Design. JISRF. Reconstructive Review. Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2015.
Koh IJ, et al. Are the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty new instruments reducing the bearing dislocation risk while improving components relationships? A case control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res (2016).
Tu, Yihui, et al. "Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2016): 1-7.
Psychoyios, V., et al. Wear of Congruent Meniscal Bearings in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br). 80 B: 876-82, 1998.
Beard D, Price A, Davies L, et al. A Multicentre Randomised Study Comparing Total or Partial Knee Replacement – One Year Results of The Topkat Trial. BASK. Liverpool, UK 2016.
Brown, N.M., et al. Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Higher Postoperative Morbidity Than Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty. (2012) 86:90.
Hutyra, C.A., et al. Patient Preferences for Surgical Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:2022-31
UK National Joint Registry Report. 2020.
Dattilo, JR. et al. Narcotic Consumption in Opioid Naïve Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 35 (2020) 2022-2026.
Fox, D. (2012) Oxford Fixed Lateral Tibia - Lateral Tibial Plateau Profile Mapping Study Report. [Unpublished report]

The Oxford Partial Knee is intended for use in individuals with osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis limited to the medial compartment of the knee and is intended to be implanted with bone cement. The Oxford Partial Knee is not indicated for use in the lateral compartment or for patients with ligament deficiency. Potential risks include, but are not limited to, loosening, dislocation, fracture, wear and infection, any of which can require additional surgery.

All content herein is protected by copyright, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, as applicable, owned by or licensed to Zimmer Biomet or its affiliates unless otherwise indicated, and must not be redistributed, duplicated or disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Zimmer Biomet.

This material is intended for health care professionals. Distribution to any other recipient is prohibited.

For product information, including indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential adverse effects and patient counseling information, see the package insert and information on this website.

Oxford® Partial Knee Replacement

The most widely used1 and clinically proven2,3 partial knee in the world